As I discuss inversions, I am thinking of the challenging ones in our book like crow, side crow, shoulder stand, headstand, etc. I know forward fold and supported bridge and such are inversions, but they are quite gentle and i would say that most students don’t think about them being an inversion.
Whether or not to include inversions (the full versions) in a class starts with the description. Maybe a level two class, but most likely a level three. Beginning, level one, pre-natal, and restorative, in my opinion, should not include inversions. The second consideration is the studio. I know I usually practice at BOY and can count on one hand the number of times I’ve been cued into an inversion in class. I’ve been going to Kasa for a few weeks now, and there are at least two teachers that cue them regularly.
As a teacher, it is so important to really get a feel for your students and their abilities before trying to cue an inversion in class. It really takes a lot of strength and confidence. Personally, I would find it very difficult to cue an inversion that I couldn’t practice at home first. For example, I can’t hold crow for more than a second or two, but I know how to get into it and could practice cuing it based on how it feels. I’m not close to a headstand. I won’t be cuing that in class any time soon.
I am trying to find my balance of yoga and other work outs. I pulled my free weights out the other day and want to try to find time to get back to them. Between that, trying new studios, and continuing practice, I hope to build the strength I need to get into more inversions.
If I do teach them, I am going to be going back to my notes from our class with Colleen. She gave us many “modified” versions of inversions that are just as effective and are good stepping stones for the full version. For example, supported legs up the wall as a way to work into shoulder stand. Or crow laying down. Or gate into modified half moon. All are great starter poses and give a teacher some knowledge into what their students can do.